Every support ticket is a gift.
Your support ticket logs contain valuable insights into your customer, like:
But most companies face challenges when actually extracting those insights.
With any significant number of tickets, categorising them accurately becomes a ruthlessly difficult task.
The latest developments in machine learning-based NLP overcome this challenge well, allowing companies like yours to automate ticket tagging and use those tags to optimise their customer service.
In this article, we'll cover:
Let's start with the basics.
Ticket tagging is the name given to the labelling or categorisation of support queries with additional information about them.
The specific labels and categories vary widely, but they all fall into these groups within a help desk like Zendesk:
A set of tags commonly used to fill these fields on your support ticketing system is called a ‘taxonomy’ which is simply a method of classification.
Priority tags are usually limited and easy to categorise, most companies simply apply an URGENT tag to those that need special attention. However, priority categorisation could be more complex and help achieve goals like improve CSAT and reduce SLAs.
Read more on this subject: How to properly prioritize support tickets.
‘Reason for contact’ ticket tagging are the most complex and critical of ticket tags.
These tags are used to identify the ‘topics’ of conversation—the reasons a customer has reached out—to enable reporting across the organisation. The taxonomies can be vast because there may be 100s of reasons your customers are contacting you and therefore 100s of options to choose from when selecting a label.
Accurate, detailed ticket tags are a powerful ally for customer support teams looking to reduce ticket volumes, improve customer satisfaction and optimise their processes.
Leveraging support data is becoming a much bigger part of businesses’ CX programmes.
Insights from surveys are good for getting broad and high level customer journey level insights.
However, there is increasingly an appetite for granular insights, where real life, unbiased examples can be used to measure customer health and derive actions.
Support conversations have these characteristics:
These four characteristics make support conversations one of the most trustable, useful bits of customer insight a company can add to their feedback program.
Categorising those conversations at a granular level and reporting them to the right team is powerful for a business.
Support ticket insights are helping companies to undertake root cause analysis (to tackle specific points of customer friction) as well as to prioritize their product improvement roadmap (to tackle the biggest drivers of churn first).
With granular ticket tag insights:
To be more specific, you can use granular, accurate 'reason for contact' tag insights for applications like these:
With intelligent ticket tags, you can automate processes that improve SLAs, reduce customer friction and save agents time.
To give you an overview of the power of ticket tags, we recently wrote an article titled ‘22 strategic ways to use ticket tags’.
Here are our top three automations:
1/ Ticket prioritisation: Some topics are more important than others. For example, if the customer is really angry; the topic is timely or it's correlated with customer churn. With accurate tagging, a response to those tickets can be prioritised so the issue can be mitigated faster.
2/ Ticket routing: Improve response and resolution time by instantly routing support tickets of a certain topic to the individual or team best equipped to handle that problem.
3/ Template response suggestion: Speed up response time and save agents time by auto-suggesting templates from your library based on the topic of conversation.
Getting accurate, granular tags in place can optimise and improve your customer service across the board.
Many companies have a simplistic manual process in place: once the ticket has been handled by the agent, they simply apply a ‘reason for contact’ tag which is chosen from a library of options.
However, this falls short of useful because most companies have large taxonomies of tags—having 100s of categories in the library to choose from—make it confusing for agents.
This leads to:
1/ Inconsistency: Large taxonomies make it difficult to consistently apply tags. They must choose from a large library of ‘reasons’ in under 10 seconds and usually just make a snap judgement. Between multiple agents, they often will choose different tags for different reasons, categorising tickets differently.
2/ Generic tags: Most conversations cover many topics and contain frustrations that could be useful to know about. However, agents will typically apply only the obvious tags, like ‘refund’ and not the various complaints that customers had. Generic tags offer a basic categorisation but it still requires a significant amount of sifting through the data to get granular, actionable insight.
Inaccurate, inconsistent, and generic ticket tags usually means that a significant amount of manual analysis and data processing time is required to reveal any meaningful results.
For automated ticket tagging to be effective, you need to find automation software that provides a combination of accurate and granular tags.
Modern machine learning technology is the best fit for the job of ticket tagging because it overcomes many of the limitations of manual and less intelligent automated systems.
We cover the topic in more depth in this article 'Why is machine learning NLP so good at Zendesk support ticket categorisation?'
A common way people automate ticket tagging is by using the ‘in-built’ automation in their help desk.
In-built systems use a methodology called ‘keyword extraction’ and follow a set of simple rules that you must write yourself.
For example, one rule could be "if the word ‘refund’ is present in the conversation, apply the ‘refund' tag".
This method of automated ticket tagging is only as good as the rules you supply it with. It also blindly follows those rules, so even if the customer says ‘I don’t want a refund, I want X, Y, Z.’ that conversation will be categorised incorrectly as a ‘refund’.
The two main flaws in keyword-based ticket tagging are:
1/ You will never cover every rule. However hard you try, some customers will say it differently or misspell the words. This means it’s hard to trust the numbers you report—is it really 100 tickets this month? Or is it 1,000 but the automation missed them?
2/ Many tickets will be incorrectly tagged. As mentioned, tags are applied blindly based on the presence of a keyword, not because it understands the true ‘meaning’ of the conversation (which is possible with machine learning auto-tagging).
We do a thorough comparative analysis of the different methods of automated tagging in this article.
We've dedicated years to building the solution ourselves.
With a simple integration into your help desk, our machine learning-based tagging engine will process and tag every support ticket as they come in.
You'll have a customised NLP model that's trained to understand free text in your unique business context.
In short: you'll have consistent, granular and highly accurate ticket tags
A machine-learning based system relies on more modern ‘statistical inference’ techniques. Once it’s learned to understand human language in a particular environment—say, the legal world—it can infer the meaning of misspellings, omitted words, and new words without a human setting up a new rule.
Machine-learning also learns the patterns between phrases and sentences and is constantly optimising and evolving itself so that it’s level of accuracy is getting ever closer to reality.
After a little encouragement, we could let it loose on a data set and it would categorise it with increasingly higher accuracy.
Let’s take a look at all three in action:
As you can see, keyword extraction and rule-based NLP is simplistic and inaccurate. Over thousands of support queries the impact is enormous. Machine learning is more intelligent with its tagging, providing much greater accuracy.
Keyword extraction: Blindly tags any keyword it’s told to (this is what help desks like Zendesk have built-in).
Rule-based: Blindly follows more advanced rules. It might know ‘adjective’ + ‘noun’ indicates a customer's opinion about that noun. So ‘bad’ + ‘quality’, indicates a quality issue for another noun mentioned, ‘camera’, let's tag the topic with ‘camera quality’. (This is what low quality software providers often use).
Machine-learning: Doesn’t blindly tag keywords or ‘rules’. It infers meaning based on patterns between words and the wider context of the sentence and paragraph they sit within. In the above example, the last sentence says ‘I don’t want a refund’, machine-learning is the only one to understand this nuance and not tag the ticket with the topic ‘refund’.
The speed and power of our machine learning-based automation means that you'll have:
• Your entire customer support ticket log history accurately tagged
• An easy-to-use dashboard (shown below) that makes understanding customer contacts easy. Unlimited logins mean the insight doesn't have to be siloed.
• Real-time intelligent tags pushed into your help desk, ready to power your automations.
• Daily updates on trending issues
• Machine learning continuously looking for and surfacing new issues affecting customers
We pride ourselves on:
We know you'll love it, so we offer you a 30-day free trial to prove it works on your data.
Zendesk has tagging automation built in to the system, however, Zendesk's automation system is rudimentary.
You must tell it to tag a ticket based on the presence of a keyword.
Our customers come to us because they are unhappy with how Zendesk does it. The tags are generic and inaccurate so often that any meaningful analysis takes hours and hours of time each week.
If you want to fully automate your Zendesk tagging and reporting, please book a demo with us to discuss further how we can help you.
🤝 Opportunities to contribute
📈 Tactical advice for customer service & CX
📚 Free eBooks, articles and podcasts
💕 +1,000 industry professionals